Mark,
On 8/16/24 04:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/08/2024 19:12, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
<snip/>
I think that
1) We would better switch to "ignore" mode right now, in all supported
versions.
Based on past experience I am extremely hesitant to change anything
related to cookie handling behaviour unless we have to. I'd prefer to
use "name" as the default more for 9.0.x and 10.1.x.
I'm prepared to be convinced otherwise though.
2) The "empty name" option seems to be the correct behaviour,
But as the majority of web applications would not need this feature,
I think that\ "ignore" would better remain the default behaviour.
No objections to that.
I'm going to start working on this "noEqualsCookie" option. Suggestions
for a better name still welcome.
cookiesWithoutEquals?
noEqualsCookie just reads weirdly to me.
-chri
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
