On 26/08/2024 15:09, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 8/16/24 04:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/08/2024 19:12, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
<snip/>
I think that
1) We would better switch to "ignore" mode right now, in all
supported versions.
Based on past experience I am extremely hesitant to change anything
related to cookie handling behaviour unless we have to. I'd prefer to
use "name" as the default more for 9.0.x and 10.1.x.
I'm prepared to be convinced otherwise though.
2) The "empty name" option seems to be the correct behaviour,
But as the majority of web applications would not need this feature,
I think that\ "ignore" would better remain the default behaviour.
No objections to that.
I'm going to start working on this "noEqualsCookie" option.
Suggestions for a better name still welcome.
cookiesWithoutEquals?
That sounds better to me too. Thanks. We haven't had any releases so I
can easily do a rename. Unless there are objections, I'll do this tomorrow.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
