On iSeries it's created as 0666 (qtmhhttp:0) 2007/3/15, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 9:36 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Do we *really* want 0666 on these things? Wouldn't 0644 be better? > > Of course. I just made that compile time enabled for faulty kernels. > I'll check if the 0644 works for flock. > It should... these are opened early enough and since the fd's are shared, the subprocesses/threads should still have access. Under Apache 1.3 we even have them 0600 :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
