Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
I didn't really read this commit, but it's Log entry reminds me of the
following:
This is for shm lock, not for the shared memory, so the name is
irrelevant, and will be destroyed on exit.
Also, we store workers in shared memory, so any attempt to
have a shared memory between instances is tricky, because
it can lead to a total mess if the configuration is not
exactly the same (even ordering matters).
Regards,
Mladen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
