Sriram Narayanan wrote: > On 9/12/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would prefer #2, to give the user(s) a chance to help us out or at >> least tell us they're no longer using that Tomcat version, or >> whatever. >> > > Ack. Thanks.
So far you seem to be too quick to mark things as invalid. Just because something is old and no-one has looked at it doesn't mean it is invalid. As Yoav indicated, NEEDINFO is often a better state for these. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
