On 9/13/06, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 3:16 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Advice sought on closing bugs > > Sriram Narayanan wrote: > > On 9/12/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I would prefer #2, to give the user(s) a chance to help us > out or at > >> least tell us they're no longer using that Tomcat version, or > >> whatever. > >> > > > > Ack. Thanks. > > So far you seem to be too quick to mark things as invalid. Just > because something is old and no-one has looked at it doesn't mean it > is invalid. As Yoav indicated, NEEDINFO is often a better > state for these. > But in this case, almost all of them are for 3.2.x, which hasn't had a maintainer in over five years :). IMHO, you could mark them all as WONTFIX. I'm happy enough that Sriram is actually testing against 3.3.2.
Ack. I've read Mark's opinions on the same (on the list as well as on the bug reports). I'll think more carefully before choosing between INVALID and WONTFIX. -- Sriram --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
