Bill Barker wrote: > But in this case, almost all of them are for 3.2.x, which hasn't had a > maintainer in over five years :). IMHO, you could mark them all as WONTFIX. > I'm happy enough that Sriram is actually testing against 3.3.2.
Anyone looking at open bugs is a good thing and I welcome Sriram's contribution. My concern was marking stuff as INVALID that isn't. I have no issue with marking old bugs in unsupported versions as WONTFIX. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
