Hi I have downgraded servicemix-5.1.x and servicemix-5.0.x to Karaf 2.3.4 and upgraded master and servicemix-5.1.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0. I have reopened some issue which, I think, will be no more fixed after the downgrade. We should check them again
Best regards Krzysztof On 13.06.2014 14:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Good point. > > To limit the change on a minor release, I would just downgrade to > Karaf 2.3.4 in SMX 5.0.x and keep ActiveMQ current version. > We will focus on the 5.10 upgrade in SMX 5.1.x. > > My $0.01. > > Regards > JB > > On 06/13/2014 02:53 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote: >> One remark for upgrading 5.0.x. The activemq-camel in the new ActiveMQ >> version (since 5.9.1) is no more merged with activemq-osgi ueberbundle. >> Thus some additional changes in the ServiceMix ActiveMQ modules and >> features have to be performed (look at the changes in activemq and >> assembly modules in >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/?p=servicemix.git;a=commit;h=f6f10bf715621e056bdc691cfc705697b1907862) >> >> >> On 13.06.2014 13:51, Gert Vanthienen wrote: >>> Hi Krzysztof, >>> >>> I would give that a go, at least. It looks like ActiveMQ 5.10.0 was >>> built with Camel 2.13.1, but the features files are pointing to a >>> version range of [2.12,3) for Camel, so it should work fine. For >>> something like Camel, where people are actually using the API/classes >>> themselves, upgrading to a new minor version in a bugfix release would >>> not work, but for ActiveMQ, people are mostly using this as a service >>> provided by the platform so that should be a bit less of a concern. >>> So yeah, I would do the ActiveMQ upgrade for 5.0.x as well. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gert Vanthienen >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Gert >>>> >>>> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only >>>> change >>>> should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4? >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Krzysztof >>>> >>>> On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote: >>>>> L.S., >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things >>>>> do look a lot better there. How about we just commit those to the >>>>> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to >>>>> test >>>>> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new >>>>> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ >>>>> upgrade >>>>> to 5.10.0 on Monday? Similarly, I think I would do the same changes >>>>> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well. >>>>> Wdyt? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Gert Vanthienen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Yes :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote: >>>>>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Raúl. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch >>>>>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0) >>>>>>>> containing following changes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced >>>>>>>> with 2.3.5) >>>>>>>> * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0 >>>>>>>> * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303 >>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find >>>>>>>> eventual >>>>>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>>> Krzysztof >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote: >>>>>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328: >>>>>>>>> --------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 >>>>>>>>> Key: SM-2328 >>>>>>>>> URL: >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328 >>>>>>>>> Project: ServiceMix >>>>>>>>> Issue Type: Task >>>>>>>>> Components: assemblies >>>>>>>>> Reporter: Benjamin Graf >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >>>>>>>>> (v6.2#6252) >>>>>>>>> >> > -- Krzysztof Sobkowiak JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | Twitter: @KSobkowiak Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
