One remark for upgrading 5.0.x. The activemq-camel in the new ActiveMQ version (since 5.9.1) is no more merged with activemq-osgi ueberbundle. Thus some additional changes in the ServiceMix ActiveMQ modules and features have to be performed (look at the changes in activemq and assembly modules in https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/?p=servicemix.git;a=commit;h=f6f10bf715621e056bdc691cfc705697b1907862)
On 13.06.2014 13:51, Gert Vanthienen wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > I would give that a go, at least. It looks like ActiveMQ 5.10.0 was > built with Camel 2.13.1, but the features files are pointing to a > version range of [2.12,3) for Camel, so it should work fine. For > something like Camel, where people are actually using the API/classes > themselves, upgrading to a new minor version in a bugfix release would > not work, but for ActiveMQ, people are mostly using this as a service > provided by the platform so that should be a bit less of a concern. > So yeah, I would do the ActiveMQ upgrade for 5.0.x as well. > > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Gert >> >> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only change >> should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4? >> >> Best regards >> Krzysztof >> >> On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote: >>> L.S., >>> >>> >>> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things >>> do look a lot better there. How about we just commit those to the >>> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to test >>> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new >>> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ upgrade >>> to 5.10.0 on Monday? Similarly, I think I would do the same changes >>> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well. >>> Wdyt? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gert Vanthienen >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Yes :-) >>>> >>>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote: >>>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right? >>>>> >>>>> Raúl. >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>> >>>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch >>>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0) >>>>>> containing following changes >>>>>> >>>>>> * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5) >>>>>> * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0 >>>>>> * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303 >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>) >>>>>> >>>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual >>>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards >>>>>> Krzysztof >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote: >>>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328: >>>>>>> --------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 >>>>>>> Key: SM-2328 >>>>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328 >>>>>>> Project: ServiceMix >>>>>>> Issue Type: Task >>>>>>> Components: assemblies >>>>>>> Reporter: Benjamin Graf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >>>>>>> (v6.2#6252) >>>>>>> -- Krzysztof Sobkowiak JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | Twitter: @KSobkowiak Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
