Good point.
To limit the change on a minor release, I would just downgrade to Karaf
2.3.4 in SMX 5.0.x and keep ActiveMQ current version.
We will focus on the 5.10 upgrade in SMX 5.1.x.
My $0.01.
Regards
JB
On 06/13/2014 02:53 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
One remark for upgrading 5.0.x. The activemq-camel in the new ActiveMQ
version (since 5.9.1) is no more merged with activemq-osgi ueberbundle.
Thus some additional changes in the ServiceMix ActiveMQ modules and
features have to be performed (look at the changes in activemq and
assembly modules in
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/?p=servicemix.git;a=commit;h=f6f10bf715621e056bdc691cfc705697b1907862)
On 13.06.2014 13:51, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
I would give that a go, at least. It looks like ActiveMQ 5.10.0 was
built with Camel 2.13.1, but the features files are pointing to a
version range of [2.12,3) for Camel, so it should work fine. For
something like Camel, where people are actually using the API/classes
themselves, upgrading to a new minor version in a bugfix release would
not work, but for ActiveMQ, people are mostly using this as a service
provided by the platform so that should be a bit less of a concern.
So yeah, I would do the ActiveMQ upgrade for 5.0.x as well.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Gert
Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only change
should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4?
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
L.S.,
I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
do look a lot better there. How about we just commit those to the
servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to test
and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ upgrade
to 5.10.0 on Monday? Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
Wdyt?
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
<[email protected]> wrote:
Yes :-)
On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
Raúl.
Sent from my iPad
On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
(https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
containing following changes
* downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
* upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
* remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
---------------------------------
Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
Key: SM-2328
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Task
Components: assemblies
Reporter: Benjamin Graf
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
