Just sent an email to '[email protected]'

I also checked to see if the archive location exists and it doesn't appear to:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-nifi-users/

One thing i was wondering about in your command set above was this line:
svn commit --no-auth-cache --non-interactive -m '[email protected]

Should that have been:

svn commit --no-auth-cache --non-interactive -m '[email protected]

To account for 'incubator'?

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am think it is already there. Try it.
> On Apr 20, 2015 3:53 PM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Benson,
>>
>> Is there a next step we do or does the process you kicked off just
>> take time?  Will we get a notification of when it is setup?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Thank you Benson!
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Benson Margulies
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Done:
>> >>
>> >> Submitted request(s)
>> >>
>> >> {
>> >>   "version": 4,
>> >>   "type": "podling",
>> >>   "private": true,
>> >>   "subdomain": "nifi",
>> >>   "outhost": "nifi.incubator.apache.org",
>> >>   "localpart": "users",
>> >>   "domain": "apache.org",
>> >>   "moderators": "[email protected],[email protected]",
>> >>   "muopts": "mu",
>> >>   "replytolist": true,
>> >>   "notifyee": "[email protected]"
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> svn add -- input/nifi-users.json
>> >>
>> >> A         input/nifi-users.json
>> >>
>> >> svn add -- input/nifi+.json
>> >>
>> >> A         input/nifi+.json
>> >>
>> >> svn commit --no-auth-cache --non-interactive -m '[email protected]
>> >> mailing list request by bimargulies via 140.211.11.72' --
>> >> input/nifi-users.json input/nifi+.json
>> >>
>> >> Adding         input/nifi+.json
>> >>
>> >> Adding         input/nifi-users.json
>> >>
>> >> Transmitting file data ..
>> >>
>> >> Committed revision 948036.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Benson, Mentors,
>> >>>
>> >>> We received a reply from INFRA that the way to get this setup is to
>> >>> request from the PMC Chair (i assume that is you?)
>> >>>
>> >>> "
>> >>> hi
>> >>>
>> >>> pleae get pmc chair to fiil out:-
>> >>>
>> >>> https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>> https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq
>> >>> "
>> >>>
>> >>> Can you please do this?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> Joe
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> > Here is the INFRA ticket for this:
>> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9462
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >> Aldrin,
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I agree and a few others have brought it up as well.  There haven't
>> >>> >> been any objections that I am aware of so will send in the INFRA
>> >>> >> ticket shortly.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Also for everyone's awareness i started a meetup for folks in the
>> DC,
>> >>> >> MD, VA area.  Our first event is here:
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://www.meetup.com/Apache-NiFi-Users-Group-DC-VA-MD/events/221910531/
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> We hope to see folks there.  We've had two companies offer their
>> space
>> >>> >> on a recurring basis both of which are in the Columbia, MD area.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Thanks
>> >>> >> Joe
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> Presentations provided by both Joe Witt and Joey Echeverria sparked
>> >>> >>> interest in NiFi.  To that end, a lot of the dialog occurring was
>> less
>> >>> >>> specifically development focused and more on how to use NiFi,
>> >>> explaining
>> >>> >>> scope of the project, and how to integrate with existing data flow,
>> >>> >>> inclusive of suggestions on ideas for data formats and
>> >>> sources/destinations
>> >>> >>> for data.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> For the sake of separation, does it make sense to now introduce a
>> users
>> >>> >>> list in conjunction with the dev list to facilitate the separation
>> of
>> >>> >>> channels of information?  Not sure what kind of lead time is
>> needed for
>> >>> >>> infra (assuming this is in fact done through them), so even if
>> this is
>> >>> a
>> >>> >>> bit on the early side, it may coincide with a juncture when a
>> >>> legitimate
>> >>> >>> need is there.
>> >>>
>>

Reply via email to