Done:
Submitted request(s)
{
"version": 4,
"type": "podling",
"private": true,
"subdomain": "nifi",
"outhost": "nifi.incubator.apache.org",
"localpart": "users",
"domain": "apache.org",
"moderators": "[email protected],[email protected]",
"muopts": "mu",
"replytolist": true,
"notifyee": "[email protected]"
}
svn add -- input/nifi-users.json
A input/nifi-users.json
svn add -- input/nifi+.json
A input/nifi+.json
svn commit --no-auth-cache --non-interactive -m '[email protected]
mailing list request by bimargulies via 140.211.11.72' --
input/nifi-users.json input/nifi+.json
Adding input/nifi+.json
Adding input/nifi-users.json
Transmitting file data ..
Committed revision 948036.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Benson, Mentors,
>
> We received a reply from INFRA that the way to get this setup is to
> request from the PMC Chair (i assume that is you?)
>
> "
> hi
>
> pleae get pmc chair to fiil out:-
>
> https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq
>
> Thanks!
> https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq
> "
>
> Can you please do this?
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Here is the INFRA ticket for this:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9462
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Aldrin,
> >>
> >> I agree and a few others have brought it up as well. There haven't
> >> been any objections that I am aware of so will send in the INFRA
> >> ticket shortly.
> >>
> >> Also for everyone's awareness i started a meetup for folks in the DC,
> >> MD, VA area. Our first event is here:
> >>
> http://www.meetup.com/Apache-NiFi-Users-Group-DC-VA-MD/events/221910531/
> >>
> >> We hope to see folks there. We've had two companies offer their space
> >> on a recurring basis both of which are in the Columbia, MD area.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Joe
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> Presentations provided by both Joe Witt and Joey Echeverria sparked
> >>> interest in NiFi. To that end, a lot of the dialog occurring was less
> >>> specifically development focused and more on how to use NiFi,
> explaining
> >>> scope of the project, and how to integrate with existing data flow,
> >>> inclusive of suggestions on ideas for data formats and
> sources/destinations
> >>> for data.
> >>>
> >>> For the sake of separation, does it make sense to now introduce a users
> >>> list in conjunction with the dev list to facilitate the separation of
> >>> channels of information? Not sure what kind of lead time is needed for
> >>> infra (assuming this is in fact done through them), so even if this is
> a
> >>> bit on the early side, it may coincide with a juncture when a
> legitimate
> >>> need is there.
>
