Benson, Mentors, We received a reply from INFRA that the way to get this setup is to request from the PMC Chair (i assume that is you?)
" hi pleae get pmc chair to fiil out:- https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq Thanks! https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq " Can you please do this? Thanks Joe On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is the INFRA ticket for this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9462 > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Aldrin, >> >> I agree and a few others have brought it up as well. There haven't >> been any objections that I am aware of so will send in the INFRA >> ticket shortly. >> >> Also for everyone's awareness i started a meetup for folks in the DC, >> MD, VA area. Our first event is here: >> http://www.meetup.com/Apache-NiFi-Users-Group-DC-VA-MD/events/221910531/ >> >> We hope to see folks there. We've had two companies offer their space >> on a recurring basis both of which are in the Columbia, MD area. >> >> Thanks >> Joe >> >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Presentations provided by both Joe Witt and Joey Echeverria sparked >>> interest in NiFi. To that end, a lot of the dialog occurring was less >>> specifically development focused and more on how to use NiFi, explaining >>> scope of the project, and how to integrate with existing data flow, >>> inclusive of suggestions on ideas for data formats and sources/destinations >>> for data. >>> >>> For the sake of separation, does it make sense to now introduce a users >>> list in conjunction with the dev list to facilitate the separation of >>> channels of information? Not sure what kind of lead time is needed for >>> infra (assuming this is in fact done through them), so even if this is a >>> bit on the early side, it may coincide with a juncture when a legitimate >>> need is there.
