Kay, I'll wait a bit more before I look into it more. Thanks :-)
--jason
On Jul 18, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
On unix os's maybe with a little caution. I've had trouble recently on
Windows and we've made a lot of progress in a short time. There are
still a couple issues we saw today. I would say to wait just a little
longer. Close, very close.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
Dillon
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:31 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Core IT archetypes
Is the new archtetypeng plugin functional enough for widespread use?
--jason
On Jul 18, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Hello,
I'm just starting to look at creating core-it archetypes with the new
archetypeng plugin. While I'm reviewing the various existing tests,
I'm
curious what types of IT tests the group thinks are valuable, or
which
tests might be good representations.
One question to answer is do we need a single module archetype and a
multimodule archetype? I don't have a strong opinion either way
although
I am leaning towards one multi module archetype. It's usually
easier to
slim down an archetype than scale one up. I also think that the
multimodule tests are more representative of what should be done. (ie
install something, then run another build for the test)
Besides single / multi-module tests, are there other categories that
should be considered? (ones that deal with repos, local settings,
other?)
--Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
