On unix os's maybe with a little caution. I've had trouble recently on Windows and we've made a lot of progress in a short time. There are still a couple issues we saw today. I would say to wait just a little longer. Close, very close.
-----Original Message----- From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:31 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Core IT archetypes Is the new archtetypeng plugin functional enough for widespread use? --jason On Jul 18, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: > Hello, > > I'm just starting to look at creating core-it archetypes with the new > archetypeng plugin. While I'm reviewing the various existing tests, > I'm > curious what types of IT tests the group thinks are valuable, or which > tests might be good representations. > > > > One question to answer is do we need a single module archetype and a > multimodule archetype? I don't have a strong opinion either way > although > I am leaning towards one multi module archetype. It's usually > easier to > slim down an archetype than scale one up. I also think that the > multimodule tests are more representative of what should be done. (ie > install something, then run another build for the test) > > > > Besides single / multi-module tests, are there other categories that > should be considered? (ones that deal with repos, local settings, > other?) > > > > --Brian > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
