Is the new archtetypeng plugin functional enough for widespread use?
--jason
On Jul 18, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Hello,
I'm just starting to look at creating core-it archetypes with the new
archetypeng plugin. While I'm reviewing the various existing tests,
I'm
curious what types of IT tests the group thinks are valuable, or which
tests might be good representations.
One question to answer is do we need a single module archetype and a
multimodule archetype? I don't have a strong opinion either way
although
I am leaning towards one multi module archetype. It's usually
easier to
slim down an archetype than scale one up. I also think that the
multimodule tests are more representative of what should be done. (ie
install something, then run another build for the test)
Besides single / multi-module tests, are there other categories that
should be considered? (ones that deal with repos, local settings,
other?)
--Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
