Guten Tag Robert Middleton, am Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2020 um 23:54 schrieben Sie:
> I would be curious to know how things work for you. I think that I've > avoided a lot of the C++14 and C++17 features, but some may have snuck > in(although from looking at the Embarcadero wiki any recent version > should support both). I'm using C++Builder 10.2 with the legacy compiler currently, that surely doesn't support C++14 or 17. So what should I test? Do you want to create a DRAFT-PR on GitHub or tell me some special branch in your fork or ...? The DRAFT seems like the easiest approach. > That's something that I've been thinking of as well - especially if we > throw in the std::shared_ptr into the release as well. There are some > other things that I would like to see for a big release as well, so > perhaps that should be the next goal? Thinking about that, I'm going > to make a few JIRA issues for that so I don't forget them. Next goal with or without 0.11.1? :-) Seems to me like skipping 0.11.1 is less work in the end and should therefore be preferred? Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning AM-SoFT IT-Service - Bitstore Hameln GmbH E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de Web: http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon: 05151- 9468-55 Fax: 05151- 9468-88 Mobil: 0178-8 9468-04 Firmensitz: Bitstore IT-Consulting, Frankfurter Allee 285, 10317 Berlin Steuernummer 037/230/30566, HR 27198, Amtsgericht Potsdam Geschäftsführer Janine Galonska
