> I'm somewhat sure to try your changes on my
> Windows as well, which might lead to additional changes, which might
> make the release with included changes obsolete already.

I would be curious to know how things work for you.  I think that I've
avoided a lot of the C++14 and C++17 features, but some may have snuck
in(although from looking at the Embarcadero wiki any recent version
should support both).

> I wonder if the changes to the docs, the removal of autotools from the
> release etc. are a breaking change worth for something like 0.12.0
> anyway.
>

That's something that I've been thinking of as well - especially if we
throw in the std::shared_ptr into the release as well.  There are some
other things that I would like to see for a big release as well, so
perhaps that should be the next goal?  Thinking about that, I'm going
to make a few JIRA issues for that so I don't forget them.

-Robert Middleton

On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 3:44 PM Thorsten Schöning <tschoen...@am-soft.de> wrote:
>
> Guten Tag Robert Middleton,
> am Samstag, 26. Dezember 2020 um 19:10 schrieben Sie:
>
> > Thoughts?
>
> Do you really think the changes for 0.11.1 are worth it to do a
> release or do you only want to have a release testing+documenting the
> new release process with? I'm somewhat sure to try your changes on my
> Windows as well, which might lead to additional changes, which might
> make the release with included changes obsolete already.
>
> I wonder if the changes to the docs, the removal of autotools from the
> release etc. are a breaking change worth for something like 0.12.0
> anyway.
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
> Thorsten Schöning
>
> --
> Thorsten Schöning
> AM-SoFT IT-Service - Bitstore Hameln GmbH
>
> E-Mail:  thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
> Web:     http://www.AM-SoFT.de/
>
> Telefon: 05151-  9468-55
> Fax:     05151-  9468-88
> Mobil:    0178-8 9468-04
>
> Firmensitz: Bitstore IT-Consulting, Frankfurter Allee 285, 10317 Berlin
> Steuernummer 037/230/30566, HR 27198, Amtsgericht Potsdam Geschäftsführer 
> Janine Galonska
>

Reply via email to