+1 I added some comments on the wiki On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:34 AM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> *interfaces -> was supposed to be "implementations" > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:33 AM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 The planned subprojects look good. Thanks for clarifying the > > goals/anti-goals in the RPC, especially the anti-goal to not make it > > pluggable with different interfaces. > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:52 AM Aaron Lindsey <alind...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > >> +1 — I'm happy to see us move toward better testability for the > membership > >> code! > >> > >> I also left my "+1" on the wiki page comments. I noticed that the > >> "Lightweight RFC Process" document states that we're supposed to have > >> discussions on the [DISCUSS] thread: > >> > >> In addition a [DISCUSS] email should be send to the dev mailing list. > >> > Discussion will take place in the email thread. > >> > > >> > >> Can we clarify how to have discussions on proposals? Personally, I don't > >> care either way as long as it's clear how the process is supposed to > work. > >> > >> - Aaron > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:04 PM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks to folks who put in review comments today. We're shooting for > >> > closing this RFC this week. > >> > > >> > > >> > On 8/30/19 3:50 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > >> > > Hi all, > >> > > > >> > > We added the following RFC to the wiki about moving Geode's > membership > >> > > system to a separate gradle sub-project. Please review and comment > by > >> > > 9/6/2019. > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/WRB4Bw > >> > > > >> > > Thanks! > >> > > -Dan > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
