*interfaces -> was supposed to be "implementations" On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:33 AM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 The planned subprojects look good. Thanks for clarifying the > goals/anti-goals in the RPC, especially the anti-goal to not make it > pluggable with different interfaces. > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:52 AM Aaron Lindsey <alind...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> +1 — I'm happy to see us move toward better testability for the membership >> code! >> >> I also left my "+1" on the wiki page comments. I noticed that the >> "Lightweight RFC Process" document states that we're supposed to have >> discussions on the [DISCUSS] thread: >> >> In addition a [DISCUSS] email should be send to the dev mailing list. >> > Discussion will take place in the email thread. >> > >> >> Can we clarify how to have discussions on proposals? Personally, I don't >> care either way as long as it's clear how the process is supposed to work. >> >> - Aaron >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:04 PM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks to folks who put in review comments today. We're shooting for >> > closing this RFC this week. >> > >> > >> > On 8/30/19 3:50 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > We added the following RFC to the wiki about moving Geode's membership >> > > system to a separate gradle sub-project. Please review and comment by >> > > 9/6/2019. >> > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/WRB4Bw >> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > > -Dan >> > > >> > >> >
