+1 The planned subprojects look good. Thanks for clarifying the goals/anti-goals in the RPC, especially the anti-goal to not make it pluggable with different interfaces.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:52 AM Aaron Lindsey <alind...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 — I'm happy to see us move toward better testability for the membership > code! > > I also left my "+1" on the wiki page comments. I noticed that the > "Lightweight RFC Process" document states that we're supposed to have > discussions on the [DISCUSS] thread: > > In addition a [DISCUSS] email should be send to the dev mailing list. > > Discussion will take place in the email thread. > > > > Can we clarify how to have discussions on proposals? Personally, I don't > care either way as long as it's clear how the process is supposed to work. > > - Aaron > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:04 PM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > Thanks to folks who put in review comments today. We're shooting for > > closing this RFC this week. > > > > > > On 8/30/19 3:50 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We added the following RFC to the wiki about moving Geode's membership > > > system to a separate gradle sub-project. Please review and comment by > > > 9/6/2019. > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/WRB4Bw > > > > > > Thanks! > > > -Dan > > > > > >
