Hi Bruce, unfortunately 8e9b04470264983d0aa1c7900f6e9be2374549d9 does not 
cherry-pick cleanly into release/1.10.0.  Can you please open a PR against 
release/1.10.0?

-Owen

> On Aug 19, 2019, at 9:16 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 8:29 AM Alexander Murmann <amurm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> it's a regression in 1.10 and a serious problem.
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:38 AM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> It sounds like Udo is okay with this now.  Any other concerns?
>>> 
>>> On 8/17/19 2:07 AM, Owen Nichols wrote:
>>>> On Aug 15, 2019, at 2:09 PM, Bruce Schuchardt<bschucha...@pivotal.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> This is a fix for a problem where a member that has lost quorum does
>> not
>>> detect it and does not shut down.  The fix is small and has been
>>> extensively tested.  The fix also addresses the possibility of a member
>>> being kicked out of the cluster when it is only late in delivering a
>>> heartbeat (i.e., no availability check performed).
>>>> 
>>>> SHA: 8e9b04470264983d0aa1c7900f6e9be2374549d9
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to