There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix.

PR #3949 <https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3949> has passed all PR checks 
and has been brought into release/1.10.0 
<https://github.com/apache/geode/tree/release/1.10.0> as the critical fix for 
GEODE-3870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3870>.

GEODE-3870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3870> has been marked 
as to 'resolved in' 1.10.0.

-Owen


> On Aug 19, 2019, at 9:44 AM, Owen Nichols <onich...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bruce, unfortunately 8e9b04470264983d0aa1c7900f6e9be2374549d9 does not 
> cherry-pick cleanly into release/1.10.0.  Can you please open a PR against 
> release/1.10.0?
> 
> -Owen
> 
>> On Aug 19, 2019, at 9:16 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 8:29 AM Alexander Murmann <amurm...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> it's a regression in 1.10 and a serious problem.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:38 AM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It sounds like Udo is okay with this now.  Any other concerns?
>>>> 
>>>> On 8/17/19 2:07 AM, Owen Nichols wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 15, 2019, at 2:09 PM, Bruce Schuchardt<bschucha...@pivotal.io>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is a fix for a problem where a member that has lost quorum does
>>> not
>>>> detect it and does not shut down.  The fix is small and has been
>>>> extensively tested.  The fix also addresses the possibility of a member
>>>> being kicked out of the cluster when it is only late in delivering a
>>>> heartbeat (i.e., no availability check performed).
>>>>> 
>>>>> SHA: 8e9b04470264983d0aa1c7900f6e9be2374549d9
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to