My vote is unchanged…
+1 for on the object.

Thanks,
Mark
> On Sep 15, 2017, at 10:47 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:40 AM David Kimura <dkim...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
>> Actually, it looks like Jake is right.  According to documentation it's
>> undefined behavior since it's not a template specialization.
>> 
>> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/extending_std
>> 
>> 
> Oh yeah, I know I rejected the idea for a reason the first time. Thanks for
> pointing out the template specialization issue.
> 
> -Jake

Reply via email to