-----Original Message-----
From: Ajit Khaparde <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 10:27 PM
To: Ferruh Yigit <[email protected]>
Cc: Sunil Kumar Kori <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; Xiaoyun Li <[email protected]>; Aman 
Singh <[email protected]>; Yuying Zhang <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; Devendra Singh Rawat 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
Harman Kalra <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Igor Russkikh 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; Liron Himi <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; Pradeep Kumar Nalla <[email protected]>; Nithin Kumar 
Dabilpuram <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; Radha Chintakuntla <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; Rasesh Mody <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi 
<[email protected]>; Shahed Shaikh <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; Veerasenareddy Burru 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] app/testpmd: add queue based 
pfc CLI options

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:40 AM Ferruh Yigit <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 1/27/2022 7:13 AM, Sunil Kumar Kori wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ferruh Yigit <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 11:07 PM
> >> To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
> >> Xiaoyun Li <[email protected]>; Aman Singh 
> >> <[email protected]>; Yuying Zhang <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; Devendra Singh Rawat 
> >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; Harman Kalra 
> >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Igor 
> >> Russkikh <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda 
> >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Liron Himi 
> >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> Pradeep Kumar Nalla <[email protected]>; Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram 
> >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; Radha Chintakuntla <[email protected]>; 
> >> [email protected]; Rasesh Mody <[email protected]>; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; Satha Koteswara Rao 
> >> Kottidi <[email protected]>; Shahed Shaikh 
> >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; Sunil Kumar Kori <[email protected]>; 
> >> [email protected]; Veerasenareddy Burru <[email protected]>; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]
> >> Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] app/testpmd: add queue 
> >> based pfc CLI options
> >>
> >> External Email
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --- On 1/13/2022 10:27 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> >>> From: Sunil Kumar Kori <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> Patch adds command line options to configure queue based priority 
> >>> flow control.
> >>>
> >>> - Syntax command is given as below:
> >>>
> >>> set pfc_queue_ctrl <port_id> rx <on|off> <tx_qid> <tx_tc> \
> >>>     tx <on|off> <rx_qid> <rx_tc> <pause_time>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Isn't the order of the paramters odd, it is mixing Rx/Tx config, 
> >> what about ordering Rx and Tx paramters?
> >>
> > It's been kept like this to portray config for rx_pause and tx_pause 
> > separately i.e. mode and corresponding config.
> >
>
> What do you mean 'separately'? You need to provide all arguments anyway, 
> right?
>
> I was thinking first have the Rx arguments, later Tx, like:
>
> rx <on|off> <rx_qid> <rx_tc> tx <on|off> <tx_qid> <tx_tc> <pause_time>
I think this grouping is better.

>
> Am I missing something, is there a benefit of what you did in this patch?

Mentioned syntax takes input as per below config structure:
struct rte_eth_pfc_queue_conf {
        enum rte_eth_fc_mode mode; /**< Link flow control mode */

        struct {
                uint16_t tx_qid; /**< Tx queue ID */
                uint8_t tc; /**< Traffic class as per PFC (802.1Qbb) spec */
        } rx_pause; /* Valid when (mode == FC_RX_PAUSE || mode == FC_FULL) */

        struct {
                uint16_t pause_time; /**< Pause quota in the Pause frame */
                uint16_t rx_qid;     /**< Rx queue ID */
                uint8_t tc; /**< Traffic class as per PFC (802.1Qbb) spec */
        } tx_pause; /* Valid when (mode == FC_TX_PAUSE || mode == FC_FULL) */
};

First part represent first structure information and later part represent 
second structure information.
For the next version, I am keeping this syntax as it is and will be fixing some 
ethdev changes.

>
> >>> - Example command to configure queue based priority flow control
> >>>     on rx and tx side for port 0, Rx queue 0, Tx queue 0 with pause
> >>>     time 2047
> >>>
> >>> testpmd> set pfc_queue_ctrl 0 rx on 0 0 tx on 0 0 2047
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Kori <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> <...>
>

Reply via email to