Carsten Ziegeler dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> I think in this "special" case we can remove the jisp >> support. Remember there were problems using jisp. So, I think >> even users using deprecated stuff should avoid using jisp, if >> they expect stability. And at least, we cannot also update >> the jar because of the new GPL. Then we have only 2 >> options: >> >> 1-Stay with the buggy code, even when we know about that or... >> 2-Remove the buggy code. Currently, we have 2 new cache solutions. >> >> I will prefer (2). >> >> Do you think we need a vote for that? Or to request users >> feedback (in users mailist)? >> > No, I don't think we need a vote - just do what you think is best :) > But I agree, that we can remove the code in this case - we too many > cache solutions anyway.
I already removed the last 2 classes using jisp. Seems to work to me. Anyway, please cross check. ;-) Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
