Carsten Ziegeler dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> I think in this "special" case we can remove the jisp >> support. Remember there were problems using jisp. So, I think >> even users using deprecated stuff should avoid using jisp, if >> they expect stability. And at least, we cannot also update >> the jar because of the new GPL. Then we have only 2 >> options: >> >> 1-Stay with the buggy code, even when we know about that or... >> 2-Remove the buggy code. Currently, we have 2 new cache solutions. >> >> I will prefer (2). >> >> Do you think we need a vote for that? Or to request users >> feedback (in users mailist)? >> > No, I don't think we need a vote - just do what you think is best :) > But I agree, that we can remove the code in this case - we too many > cache solutions anyway.
Thanks for the answer. I will try to solve that today.. I hope it would not be too dificult... ;-) BTW, Remember I owe you 3 beers! I expect to pay you in Ghent! :-D Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo > > Carsten >
