Antonio Gallardo wrote: > I think in this "special" case we can remove the jisp > support. Remember there were problems using jisp. So, I think > even users using deprecated stuff should avoid using jisp, if > they expect stability. And at least, we cannot also update > the jar because of the new GPL. Then we have only 2 > options: > > 1-Stay with the buggy code, even when we know about that or... > 2-Remove the buggy code. Currently, we have 2 new cache solutions. > > I will prefer (2). > > Do you think we need a vote for that? Or to request users > feedback (in users mailist)? > No, I don't think we need a vote - just do what you think is best :) But I agree, that we can remove the code in this case - we too many cache solutions anyway.
Carsten
