Kaspar Brand wrote:
If you're too tired to do this, then just wait until httpd v2.4 is released, as the patch is on trunk.That reflects the status of the code as of April 2008, and doesn't include any of the later improvements. But if the key httpd people aren't willing to invest time in reviewing additional patches, then it won't make any further progress, obviously.
I think you're missing the point I am trying to make. The addition of SNI is a worthy feature to be added to httpd, but you've got half way through the submission process and have chosen to start complaining that the door won't open, instead of just banging on the door some more.
I would love to donate some time to help you do this, but right now I have a queue a mile high of other stuff that needs to be finalised first. I can well imagine others are in the same boat.
Short, targeted and specific questions are quick and easy to answer, and will get you the progress you need. General questions that involve a whole lot of research first to figure out what you are referring to will be deferred to "later", and you'll end up waiting.
httpd v2.3.0-alpha is to be tagged soon, which means SNI will start being available in a release very soon, and SNI will start getting some attention from end users.
Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
