Kaspar Brand wrote:
Not really true, actually... for a fuller version of the story, see e.g.
The authoritative status of the httpd-2.2 backport is in the STATUS file in the httpd v2.2 branch, and that currently says this:
Backport version for 2.2.x of updated patch:
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/httpd-2.2.x-sni.diff
+1: fuankg
+0: like ssl upgrade of 2.2, perhaps this is a good reason to bring
httpd-2.4 to completion? vhost changes could be disruptive to
third party module authors.
-1: rpluem: jorton found some problems with the trunk version and
they
should be fixed / discussed in trunk before we backport.
If you want to see SNI in httpd v2.2, work to resolve the issues rpluem
is referring to.
Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
