Graham Leggett wrote: > The way the process works is that you have to shepherd the patch through > all the way until all the issues are resolved. And if someone raises > an issue, don't assume that time will magically appear in their diary to > fix your patch for you, that is your job.
I'm getting tired of the pert tone of your replies, that's the point. Maybe you're missing the fact that SNI support was first added to httpd trunk in December 2007 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=606190), reflecting my enhanced version of the original SNI patch from the EdelKey project. Maybe you're ignoring the fact that I also further improved the patch before "someone raised an issue" (won't provide URLs, as you seem to ignore them as well), and that whenever new concerns or issues were brought up on httpd-dev, I was promptly looking into it and came up with suggested fixes (patches) for trunk. Maybe you're also overlooking the fact that in June, I did exactly what I was advised to do, but got zero replies afterwards. > If you're too tired to do this, then just wait until httpd v2.4 is > released, as the patch is on trunk. That reflects the status of the code as of April 2008, and doesn't include any of the later improvements. But if the key httpd people aren't willing to invest time in reviewing additional patches, then it won't make any further progress, obviously. Kaspar _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
