Frank Hecker: > > Is your concern that the CPS is dated after the audit? Not really, but just the fact that the audit was performed at a period prior to the CPS publishing and KPMG confirming it. It's a little bit hard to imagine that they covered the CPS during that period - somehow the statement doesn't look good right now. > I don't think you need to > invoke the monopoly argument to explain this. > I had to bite on this one ;-) > > I have been putting a priority on evaluating EV requests vs. non-EV > requests. Yes, I know. > These are not new requests (they were made soon after I > solicited EV-related requests) but I only recently started work on them > and solicited any remaining information to fill out the pending list. In > the meantime I worked on a few other EV requests from CAs that don't > have dominant market share. > Yes I know. Frank, I very much trust you and I'm almost certain that it wasn't intentional - if at all! It just didn't look so good perhaps to someone following this list... Perhaps it's just a coincident that a representative of Verisign alarms a bunch of mailing lists at Mozilla about their CA certificates and a day later the relevant CAs are updated and ready for inclusion....you see what I mean?
-- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> Phone: +1.213.341.0390 _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
