On Monday 2018-05-28 15:52 -0400, Chris AtLee wrote:
> Here's a bit of a strawman proposal...What if we keep the
> {mozilla-central,mozilla-inbound,autoland}-{linux,linux64,macosx64,win32,win64}{,-pgo}/
> directories in tinderbox-builds for now, and delete all the others. Does
> that cover the majority of the use cases for wanting to access these old
> builds?
> 
> I'm guessing the historical builds for old esr branches aren't useful now.
> Nor are the mozilla-aurora, mozilla-beta, mozilla-release, or b2g-inbound
> builds.

This seems reasonable to me, with the one caveat that I think
b2g-inbound belongs in the other bucket.  It was essentially used as
another peer to mozilla-inbound and autoland, and while many of the
changes landed there were b2g-only, many of them weren't, and may
have caused regressions that affect products that we still maintain.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to