On Tue, 29 May 2018 at 14:21, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote:
>
> On Monday 2018-05-28 15:52 -0400, Chris AtLee wrote:
> > Here's a bit of a strawman proposal...What if we keep the
> > {mozilla-central,mozilla-inbound,autoland}-{linux,linux64,macosx64,win32,win64}{,-pgo}/
> > directories in tinderbox-builds for now, and delete all the others. Does
> > that cover the majority of the use cases for wanting to access these old
> > builds?
> >
> > I'm guessing the historical builds for old esr branches aren't useful now.
> > Nor are the mozilla-aurora, mozilla-beta, mozilla-release, or b2g-inbound
> > builds.
>
> This seems reasonable to me, with the one caveat that I think
> b2g-inbound belongs in the other bucket. It was essentially used as
> another peer to mozilla-inbound and autoland, and while many of the
> changes landed there were b2g-only, many of them weren't, and may
> have caused regressions that affect products that we still maintain.
Ok, we can do that.
For mobile, I haven't heard anybody express a desire to keep around
old CI builds in
https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/tinderbox-builds/, so I'm
planning to have those deleted in July.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
