On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:47 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 5/11/18 7:06 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>
>> Artifact retention and expiration boils down to a
>> trade-off between the cost of storage and the convenience of accessing
>> something immediately (as opposed to waiting several dozen minutes to
>> populate the cache).
>>
>
> Just to be clear, when doing a bisect, one _can_ just deal with local
> builds.  But the point is that then it takes tens of minutes per build as
> you point out.  So a bisect task that might otherwise take 10-15 minutes
> total (1 minute per downloaded build) ends up taking hours...


And this is where bisect-in-the-cloud would come in. You could trigger
dozens of builds on Taskcluster and they would all come back in the time it
takes a single build to run. Or you codify the thing you are testing for,
submit it to bisect-in-the-cloud, and it does everything for you and
reports on the results. It still might take dozens of minutes to a few
hours. But at least you wouldn't be burdened with the overhead of doing
everything manually.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to