On 2014-10-01, 6:26 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-01, 9:01 AM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
On 10/1/2014 4:23 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Cameron McCormack <c...@mcc.id.au> wrote:
On 01/10/14 17:57, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) wrote:
It seems all the compilers we use support the c++11 ">>" in template,
could we start using it in new code?
Yes we have some uses of that already. It's also mentioned in
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Using_CXX_in_Mozilla_code.
Note the large, red warning at the top of that page "This page is a
draft for expository and exploratory purposes. Do not trust the
information listed here."
I don't know why that page exists with such an authoritative-looking URL.
The warning was in part because I never got confirmation on our minimum
supported versions, particularly minimum clang version, and in part
because the C++11 library portion was never well organized.
I think the C++ language features section is quite accurate, and should be
relied on by everyone.
I don't think we have consensus on a broad use of "auto".
Sure. Like any other C++ feature, just because our compilers support it
doesn't mean it's always a good idea. That page, however, is supposed
to explain what C++ features can be used in our code from a compiler
support point of view.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
