On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2014-10-01, 9:01 AM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote: > >On 10/1/2014 4:23 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > >>On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Cameron McCormack <c...@mcc.id.au> wrote: > >>>On 01/10/14 17:57, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) wrote: > >>>>It seems all the compilers we use support the c++11 ">>" in template, > >>>>could we start using it in new code? > >>>Yes we have some uses of that already. It's also mentioned in > >>>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Using_CXX_in_Mozilla_code. > >>Note the large, red warning at the top of that page "This page is a > >>draft for expository and exploratory purposes. Do not trust the > >>information listed here." > >> > >>I don't know why that page exists with such an authoritative-looking URL. > > > >The warning was in part because I never got confirmation on our minimum > >supported versions, particularly minimum clang version, and in part > >because the C++11 library portion was never well organized. > > I think the C++ language features section is quite accurate, and should be > relied on by everyone.
I don't think we have consensus on a broad use of "auto". Mike _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
