On 6/18/13 8:12 AM, Nicolas Silva wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Gavin Sharp <ga...@gavinsharp.com> wrote:
> 
>> If we design it properly this shouldn't be a huge issue (and users
>> disabling the feature probably won't be necessary). This isn't
>> something we'd provide UI for, certainly.
>>
> 
> Then we should really measure network traffic impact and take it into
> account when we decide to ship it on mobile platforms.
> 
> 
>>> Also it's worth noting that thumbnails also have the problem of when it
>>> should be taken. As soon as web pages become applications rather than
>>> simple documents, we tend to screenshot before most of the content is on
>>> the screen. Maybe it's worth thinking about how potential solutions to
>> both
>>> problems interact.
>>
>> I think this is largely a separate problem - when to screenshot vs.
>> how to do it seem mostly unrelated. Do you have any examples of where
>> the current thumbnail code fails to capture a "good" thumbnail? I
>> think it it just uses a hard-coded delay after load, and as far as I
>> know this hasn't really been a problem in practice. B2G's requirements
>> are somewhat different given the way their screenshots are used (as a
>> perceived performance optimization rather than for thumbnails)
> 
> 
> I was indeed thinking of B2G screenshots. I haven't yet read the WHATWG
> thread that Roc pointed out, but I know some people would like to address
> the problem seen in B2G by exposing an API for the app/website to say when
> it is ready to be captured in a thumbnail (so it could be the web author's
> responsibility to let the browser know not to screenshot when sensible data
> is exposed). I don't know if the idea is good or not, but it could help
> both problems, probably.
> This not just a B2G problem, though. It is a problem for all web
> applications that load a bit of the UI and then load the content
> asynchronously. We want web apps to be well integrated everywhere. I know
> that, in practice, (some) gaia devs aren't really satisfied with the
> current screenshot strategy.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Nical
> 

Would it make sense to come up with a standard way for sites to offer
their own screenshots, in a similar way that favicons are offered?

Jorge
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to