hi john, yes - cody understood it perfectly right (also see my 2nd message which i sent at almost the same time).
regards, gerhard 2013/3/23 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > Gerhard, > > Do you agree w/ Cody's synopsis? I think mimic is what you're trying to > describe, but threw me off when you said aligned; I assumed you meant be > dependent on. > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Gerhard Petracek < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > hi john, > > > > no - we will just create our own interface like ClientWindow and provide > a > > default implementation. > > (for jsf 2.2+ we just provide an own module with an adapter which > delegates > > to javax.faces.lifecycle.ClientWindow.) > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > > > > I'm not sure I follow. We're dependent on JEE7 releases to release DS > > 0.4? > > > I hope we're not really thinking this... > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > hi john, > > > > > > > > no - it will be a new implementation aligned with the new > ClientWindow > > > api > > > > (of jsf 2.2). > > > > afterwards i finish my tickets (which need it) and then we are ready > > for > > > a > > > > release. > > > > imo the rest is nice to have for v0.4 > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Gerhard, > > > > > > > > > > But currently it's assigned to Mark. So to outsiders, who maybe > > haven't > > > > > been playing close court, someone's already handling it. > > > > > > > > > > Since CODI has a Window Scope, I'm assuming that it's simply a port > > > from > > > > > CODI to DS. > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > hi john, > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] is the most blocking one we need for v0.4. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-289 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When I look at open issues for DeltaSpike, all I see is under > > [1] ; > > > > > > looking > > > > > > > at this list it's not clear which are ready to be done or which > > > need > > > > > more > > > > > > > info. In addition when I look at [2] we end up with 50 open > > > issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > V 0.3 was released in August 2012. I'd like to help get DS to > a > > > 0.4 > > > > > > > release. So please help clarify what issues are in need of > help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DELTASPIKE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DELTASPIKE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
