yea, +1 for a release pretty soon. Will try to get my head around the WindowId stuff soon
LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: John D. Ament <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 9:04 PM > Subject: Re: Pending items for release > >G erhard, > > Do you agree w/ Cody's synopsis? I think mimic is what you're trying to > describe, but threw me off when you said aligned; I assumed you meant be > dependent on. > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Gerhard Petracek < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> hi john, >> >> no - we will just create our own interface like ClientWindow and provide a >> default implementation. >> (for jsf 2.2+ we just provide an own module with an adapter which delegates >> to javax.faces.lifecycle.ClientWindow.) >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> >> 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <[email protected]> >> >> > I'm not sure I follow. We're dependent on JEE7 releases to > release DS >> 0.4? >> > I hope we're not really thinking this... >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Gerhard Petracek < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > hi john, >> > > >> > > no - it will be a new implementation aligned with the new > ClientWindow >> > api >> > > (of jsf 2.2). >> > > afterwards i finish my tickets (which need it) and then we are > ready >> for >> > a >> > > release. >> > > imo the rest is nice to have for v0.4 >> > > >> > > regards, >> > > gerhard >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <[email protected]> >> > > >> > > > Gerhard, >> > > > >> > > > But currently it's assigned to Mark. So to outsiders, > who maybe >> haven't >> > > > been playing close court, someone's already handling it. >> > > > >> > > > Since CODI has a Window Scope, I'm assuming that > it's simply a port >> > from >> > > > CODI to DS. >> > > > >> > > > John >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Gerhard Petracek < >> > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > hi john, >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] is the most blocking one we need for v0.4. >> > > > > >> > > > > regards, >> > > > > gerhard >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-289 >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <[email protected]> >> > > > > >> > > > > > All, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > When I look at open issues for DeltaSpike, all I > see is under >> [1] ; >> > > > > looking >> > > > > > at this list it's not clear which are ready to > be done or which >> > need >> > > > more >> > > > > > info. In addition when I look at [2] we end up > with 50 open >> > issues. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > V 0.3 was released in August 2012. I'd like > to help get DS to a >> > 0.4 >> > > > > > release. So please help clarify what issues are > in need of help. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > John >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > [1] >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DELTASPIKE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> > > > > > >> > > > > > [2] >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DELTASPIKE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
