I'm not sure I follow. We're dependent on JEE7 releases to release DS 0.4? I hope we're not really thinking this...
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Gerhard Petracek < [email protected]> wrote: > hi john, > > no - it will be a new implementation aligned with the new ClientWindow api > (of jsf 2.2). > afterwards i finish my tickets (which need it) and then we are ready for a > release. > imo the rest is nice to have for v0.4 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > > Gerhard, > > > > But currently it's assigned to Mark. So to outsiders, who maybe haven't > > been playing close court, someone's already handling it. > > > > Since CODI has a Window Scope, I'm assuming that it's simply a port from > > CODI to DS. > > > > John > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > hi john, > > > > > > [1] is the most blocking one we need for v0.4. > > > > > > regards, > > > gerhard > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-289 > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > When I look at open issues for DeltaSpike, all I see is under [1] ; > > > looking > > > > at this list it's not clear which are ready to be done or which need > > more > > > > info. In addition when I look at [2] we end up with 50 open issues. > > > > > > > > V 0.3 was released in August 2012. I'd like to help get DS to a 0.4 > > > > release. So please help clarify what issues are in need of help. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DELTASPIKE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DELTASPIKE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > > > > > > >
