+1 2012/10/19 Jason Porter <[email protected]>
> +1 > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:39 PM > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle > > > > > > if there are no objections, i'll import the annotations tomorrow. > > > -> we can change the names later on (as soon as we have an agreement). > > > > > > regards, > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/10/17 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > > > > > >> I honestly don't have a preference for the names. > > >> > > >> +1 for @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase > > >> > > >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brian Leathem <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > On Wed 17 Oct 2012 11:17:46 AM PDT, Brian Leathem wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> can we not build on the @ListenerFor annotation in JSF [1]? > > >> >> > > >> >> @ListenerFor(phaseEventClass=.**..) > > >> >> > > >> >> or, if we need a unique name, perhaps: > > >> >> > > >> >> @ListenerForPhase(**phaseEventClass=...) > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > As Gerhard pointed out in IRC, this would just be a marker > > annotation, > > >> and > > >> > hence empty: > > >> > @ListenerForPhase() > > >> > > > >> > Brian > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Jason Porter > > >> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > > >> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > > >> > > >> Software Engineer > > >> Open Source Advocate > > >> > > >> PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > > >> PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Jason Porter > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > > Software Engineer > Open Source Advocate > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu > -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
