+1

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle
> >
> > if there are no objections, i'll import the annotations tomorrow.
> > -> we can change the names later on (as soon as we have an agreement).
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/10/17 Jason Porter <[email protected]>
> >
> >>  I honestly don't have a preference for the names.
> >>
> >>  +1 for @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase
> >>
> >>  On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brian Leathem <[email protected]>
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >>  > On Wed 17 Oct 2012 11:17:46 AM PDT, Brian Leathem wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  >> can we not build on the @ListenerFor annotation in JSF [1]?
> >>  >>
> >>  >> @ListenerFor(phaseEventClass=.**..)
> >>  >>
> >>  >> or, if we need a unique name, perhaps:
> >>  >>
> >>  >> @ListenerForPhase(**phaseEventClass=...)
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>  > As Gerhard pointed out in IRC, this would just be a marker
> annotation,
> >>  and
> >>  > hence empty:
> >>  > @ListenerForPhase()
> >>  >
> >>  > Brian
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>
> >>
> >>  --
> >>  Jason Porter
> >>  http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
> >>  http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
> >>
> >>  Software Engineer
> >>  Open Source Advocate
> >>
> >>  PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> >>  PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp

Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate

PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu

Reply via email to