I honestly don't have a preference for the names. +1 for @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brian Leathem <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed 17 Oct 2012 11:17:46 AM PDT, Brian Leathem wrote: > >> can we not build on the @ListenerFor annotation in JSF [1]? >> >> @ListenerFor(phaseEventClass=.**..) >> >> or, if we need a unique name, perhaps: >> >> @ListenerForPhase(**phaseEventClass=...) >> > > As Gerhard pointed out in IRC, this would just be a marker annotation, and > hence empty: > @ListenerForPhase() > > Brian > > -- Jason Porter http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/lightguardjp Software Engineer Open Source Advocate PGP key id: 926CCFF5 PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
