so it really seems a vote is needed no? - Romain
2012/7/26 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > I had suggested that awhile ago, but I don't think there was consensus. Or > maybe I just thought about it :) been awhile. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 26, 2012, at 9:22, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > hmm, not sure it answers the question. Shiro is an (fine IMO) API, DS > could > > use it as base instead of creating a new one in the Apache ecosystem. > > > > - Romain > > > > > > 2012/7/26 Anil Saldhana <[email protected]> > > > >> If Deltaspike desires to provide integration with shiro, make it as an > >> independent sub module of security. Similar to the independence of the > IDM > >> component. Security is too large to reside as a single module. > >> > >> On Jul 25, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> - Romain > >>> > >>> > >>> 2012/7/25 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> hi @ all, > >>>> > >>>> if there are objections, we have to finish the discussion before we > >>>> continue with it or we start a vote about it. > >>>> > >>>> regards, > >>>> gerhard > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2012/7/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>>> Yes, fully agree. > >>>>> I don't see any good reason to create a new framework. > >>>>> > >>>>> Shiro, which is also in Apache is really great. > >>>>> They seem really interested in integrating CDI and they plan to do > so. > >>>>> > >>>>> There is some interesting posts. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/CDI-and-WSS4J-integration-tp7577503.html > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/Security-in-DeltaSpike-tp7577514.html > >>>>> > >>>>> Jean-Louis > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2012/7/12 Mehdi Heidarzadeh <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Rather than marry into one security framework (Shiro), Deltaspike > >>>>> should > >>>>>>> enable all security frameworks to provide integration. That > includes > >> a > >>>>> DS > >>>>>>> integration from Shiro. > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Agree. If DS can provide a layer to support different existing > >>>> security > >>>>>>> frameworks (Shiro, Spring Security, ...) with perhaps JAAS modules > >>>>> (LDAP, > >>>>>>> JDBC, PropertiesFile, EncryptedPropertiesFile, ...) top of CDI, > that > >>>>>> should > >>>>>>> be fine > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> With a good provided security integration api in DS, anyone > interested > >>>> in > >>>>>> any of those security frameworks will be able to use DS and that > >> sounds > >>>>>> very nice and elegant. > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Mehdi Heidarzadeh Ardalani > >>>>>> Independent JEE Consultant, Architect and Developer. > >>>>>> http://www.TheBigJavaBlog.com > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> >
