not totally agree, security framework we are talking about are API so we add an API on an API...IMHO DS should be about CDI integration and default "enterprise" impl (JPA)
i understand quite easily it is easy to want to start from scratch since we do what we want but it sounds confusing and not consistent from an Apache point of view for me, the point would better be to contribute the projects to enhance them with missing functionnalities i think - Romain 2012/7/12 Mehdi Heidarzadeh <[email protected]> > >Rather than marry into one security framework (Shiro), Deltaspike should > >enable all security frameworks to provide integration. That includes a DS > >integration from Shiro. > +1 > > >Agree. If DS can provide a layer to support different existing security > >frameworks (Shiro, Spring Security, ...) with perhaps JAAS modules (LDAP, > >JDBC, PropertiesFile, EncryptedPropertiesFile, ...) top of CDI, that > should > >be fine > +1 > > With a good provided security integration api in DS, anyone interested in > any of those security frameworks will be able to use DS and that sounds > very nice and elegant. > -- > Mehdi Heidarzadeh Ardalani > Independent JEE Consultant, Architect and Developer. > http://www.TheBigJavaBlog.com >
