+1 - Romain
2012/7/25 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > hi @ all, > > if there are objections, we have to finish the discussion before we > continue with it or we start a vote about it. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2012/7/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > > Yes, fully agree. > > I don't see any good reason to create a new framework. > > > > Shiro, which is also in Apache is really great. > > They seem really interested in integrating CDI and they plan to do so. > > > > There is some interesting posts. > > > > > http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/CDI-and-WSS4J-integration-tp7577503.html > > > > > http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/Security-in-DeltaSpike-tp7577514.html > > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > 2012/7/12 Mehdi Heidarzadeh <[email protected]> > > > > > >Rather than marry into one security framework (Shiro), Deltaspike > > should > > > >enable all security frameworks to provide integration. That includes a > > DS > > > >integration from Shiro. > > > +1 > > > > > > >Agree. If DS can provide a layer to support different existing > security > > > >frameworks (Shiro, Spring Security, ...) with perhaps JAAS modules > > (LDAP, > > > >JDBC, PropertiesFile, EncryptedPropertiesFile, ...) top of CDI, that > > > should > > > >be fine > > > +1 > > > > > > With a good provided security integration api in DS, anyone interested > in > > > any of those security frameworks will be able to use DS and that sounds > > > very nice and elegant. > > > -- > > > Mehdi Heidarzadeh Ardalani > > > Independent JEE Consultant, Architect and Developer. > > > http://www.TheBigJavaBlog.com > > > > > >
