Marcin Juszkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef: > With 1.3.3 release I packaged this release also but not said much > about it - now I'm thinking about making it just simple, plain ROX-Filer > with only minimum of patches applied (only those which Debianish it) - > but I will wait to 1.3.4 release with it. > > But let's go to conclusion: > > I'm not Debian developer (yet - maybe some day I'll start applying to > be) so my packages are 'unofficial', non-Debian. Maybe some day they > will be 'official' on ROX HomePage (I talked about it with Jan some days > ago). > > Second thing is - what part of ROX-Filer functionality which I removed > in my package you want to have in it: > > - using Appicon.xpm as DirIcon if there is no .DirIcon > - starting dir/AppRun just by click on dir folder icon > > And one more thing: Are you using ROX-Filer? And if yes - which > packages :))
Although I really like the work that you have done, I am still using my own packages. One reason is that the AppDir isn't working anymore in your packages. Not that I really like the idea of AppDir, but : - I like the idea of using /etc/menu-methods to create a menu with all the installed programs. In your latest rox-cvs you have copied my /etc/menu-methods/rox , but this isn't very usefull without a working AppDir. - I think that the 'official' Debian ROX should work like ROX. If it works different (for example no AppDir), it should be renamed to something else. Anyway, If you create a rox-deb with working AppDir, then I think it is a good idea to use your package instead of mine. BTW.: Any plans to package rox-session? ;-) -- Met vriendelijke groetjes - Jan Wagemakers - ... movl $1, %eax ; movl $0, %ebx ; int $0x80
