On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:23:58PM +0100, John L. Fjellstad wrote: > > You're missing my point. I'm not saying deprecated means anything else that > what you wrote above, but I do disagree with you that sysfs/udev is a > replacement for devfs right *now*. As your link indicate, udev won't be > ready to take over devfs' tasks for another couple of months. > > If you have a working devfs, I see no point in trying to move to sysfs/udev. >
You're right in that it was a misunderstanding then, since I agree with what you state here. Sorry about that. If devfs works for you, by all means continue using it. There will still be some maintenance for a while, as usual in the Linux world. If you're planning to learn and/or get used to what will be used in the middle run, then check out sysfs/udev since that's where things are leading. ---------------- Nitebirdz http://www.sacredchaos.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
