-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nitebirdz wrote:
> Yes, devfs is considered to be deprecated in the 2.6 kernel and it has > been > replaced with sysfs and udev. sysfs/udev is not a replacement for devfs yet. Not everything that needs to be moved to sysfs has been moved to sysfs. And udev is still somewhere between proof-of-concept and beta... - From what I can understand from the kernel mailing list, nobody is removing devfs until the next major version (so, it will be removed during 2.7, and gone completely in 2.8). Meaning those who are using devfs now, should be safe until 2.8 comes out (I wouldn't install new systems with devfs, but I wouldn't remove devfs from systems that runs it either). - -- John L. Fjellstad web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkABe/sACgkQkz0vhQtHHRiXhwCeMyd/64yR+QLomzJMaqpiKdvX OhEAn1teemPu6KApx0JIa4aH9ox+mbnq =vyYd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
